Low anterior resection syndrome following rectal cancer surgery: are incidence and severity lower with long-term follow-up?

BACKGROUND: Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is a functional disorder that may follow restorative proctectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term incidence and risk factors for LARS following surgery for rectal cancer. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on patients from a prospectively maintained database, who underwent a restorative proctectomy between January 2014 and December 2019 at Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center. The study cohort was divided into two groups: patients following partial proctectomy with a partial mesorectal excision and a colorectal anastomosis (PME group) and patients following total proctectomy with total mesorectal excision and a coloanal anastomosis (TME group). The incidence and severity of LARS were evaluated using the LARS questionnaire. Risk factors for LARS were also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 240 patients (male: female ratio 134:106, median age 64 years [interquartile range 55-71 years]) were included in the analysis. There were 160 patients in the PME group and 80 patients in the TME group. The overall incidence of LARS was 37.4% (26.5% major LARS and 10.9% minor LARS). Major LARS was observed in 53.8% of patients who underwent TME and in 12.7% of patients who underwent PME (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, distance of the anastomosis from the anal verge, TME, and neoadjuvant radiotherapy were independent prognostic factors for LARS. The incidence and severity of LARS were significantly lower in patients with longer follow-up (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Significant improvement in LARS can be expected with longer follow-up. Distance of the anastomosis from the anal verge, TME and neoadjuvant radiotherapy are independent risk factors for LARS.

External sphincter-sparing anal fistulotomy (ESSAF): a simplified technique for the treatment of fistula-in-ano.

BACKGROUND: Fistula-in-ano due to cryptoglandular disease is a common condition. While a simple anal fistula can be treated successfully by a fistulotomy, the risk of potential damage to the anal sphincters and subsequent poor functional outcomes persist in a large portion of patients with complex fistulae. Several sphincter-preserving treatment procedures have been described for complex fistulae over the past 3 decades, with variable results and complication rates, and no procedure is proven to be superior to the others. We developed external sphincter-sparing anal fistulotomy (ESSAF), a reproducible simple modification of the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) technique for the treatment of complex fistula-in-ano.. The aim of the present study was to describe the technique and our outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of all patients who underwent ESSAF for a complex anal fistula at our institution from January 2014 to December 2019. The primary outcome measure of this study was the primary fistula healing rate. Secondary outcome measures included fecal and/or gas incontinence and postoperative complications. During the ESSAF procedure, the mucosa and skin overlying the fistula tract are incised to allow complete exposure of the sphincter complex. Then the internal sphincter muscle fibers overlying the tract are divided and the tract is meticulously curetted and debrided. Next, the internal opening of the tract traversing the external sphincter muscle is suture-ligated with absorbable sutures. Then, a minimal amount of mucosa is advanced and the incision is partially closed with absorbable sutures, while its external portion is left open for drainage. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients [43 males, median age was 50 years (range 36-63 years)] underwent ESSAF for complex anal fistula during the study period. Mean follow-up was 12 ± 14.7 months. Of the 59 patients, 42 (71.2%) experienced fistula closure, with a median healing time of 8 weeks (IQR 4-16 weeks). None of the patients developed significant anal incontinence following the procedure. One patient (1.7%) suffered from soiling and another patient (1.7%) developed postoperative bleeding. There were no infectious complications. Of the 17 patients (28.8%) who failed to heal successfully, 9 (15.2%) did not heal primarily and 8 (16%) experienced recurrence after complete healing. Thirteen (76%) of these patients underwent reoperation with complete recovery after ESSAF (n = 4), fistulotomy (n = 8) or endorectal advancement flap (ERAF) (n = 1). Overall ESSAF initiated recovery in 93.2% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: ESSAF is a feasible, safe, reproducible and effective sphincter-sparing procedure for the treatment of complex anal fistulae.

Splenic infarction complicated with abscess after pelvic trauma as the first presentation of patent foramen ovale - A case report.

Hypercoagulability after trauma is a known entity. Following significant trauma, most guidelines advise anticoagulation treatment for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis. VTE following minor trauma convoyed with arterial or systemic embolization dictate the need to search for uncommon source of thromboembolic complications. This is a report of an unusual case of pulmonary and systemic emboli complicated by splenic abscess following minor trauma in a patient with Diabetes Mellitus as the first presentation of patent foramen ovale (PFO).

Does caffeine enhance bowel recovery after elective colorectal resection? A prospective double-blinded randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative ileus is a common condition following abdominal surgery. Previous studies have shown the positive effects of coffee on gastrointestinal motility. The aim of this study was to assess whether caffeine is the stimulatory agent in coffee that triggers bowel motility and thus may reduce the duration of postoperative ileus. METHODS: This was a single-centered, prospective, randomized controlled, double-blinded clinical trial. Patients scheduled to undergo elective laparoscopic colectomy between November 2017 and March 2019 were randomly assigned to receive either oral caffeine (100 mg three times daily) or placebo following the procedure. Primary endpoints were time to first flatus and time to first bowel movement. Secondary endpoints were time to tolerate a solid, low-residue diet and length of hospital stay. Registration number: NCT03097900. RESULTS: Seventy patients were included, [35 males, median age 56 years (range 19-79 years)]. After the exclusion of 12 patients, there were 30 patients in the caffeine group and 28 patients in the placebo group. The first passage of stool in the caffeine group occurred 18 h earlier than in the placebo group (p = 0.012); other endpoints did not reach statistical significance. No caffeine-related adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION: Caffeine consumption following colectomy is safe, leads to a significantly shorter time to first bowel movement, and may thus potentially lead to a shorter postoperative hospital stay.

Trans-fascial laparoscopic mesh fixation: a procedural comparison using the standard suture passer versus iMESH stitcher™ device.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic mesh repair has become an increasingly common method for repairing incisional hernias. The current method for fixating mesh to the abdominal wall includes tacking the mesh to the peritoneum and fascia and suturing the mesh to the fascia with trans-fascial sutures. The iMESH Stitcher™ is a stitching device developed to both simplify and expedite this procedure by passing the suture from one arm of the iMESH stitcher™ to the other. The device enables a stitch to be created in three quick moves using only one hand. We compared both the efficacy and procedure time of trans-fascial mesh fixation when performed with the iMESH stitcher™ as compared to the standard suture passer method. METHODS: A mesh patch was installed on the internal abdominal wall of two pigs. Surgical residents and Medical students were participants in the study and were trained in both techniques. Each participant was asked to perform six fixations with each technique. The procedural time required for both fixation techniques was recorded. Participants were asked to assess subjectively the relative difficulty of each technique on a scale of 1-10 (10 = most difficult). RESULTS: Sixteen residents and students performed a total of 12 mesh fixations, each performing 6 fixations with each technique. Average mesh fixation suture time using the suture passer technique was 44 s for residents and 47 s for students. Average fixation suture time using the iMESH stitcherTM was 17 s for residents and 15 s for students. The average difficulty score for the suture passer technique was 6.1 as compared to 2.9 with iMESH stitcher™. CONCLUSION: Trans-fascial fixation with the iMESH Stitcher™ took significantly less time than the standard suture passer method. The iMESH Stitcher™ significantly simplifies the procedure of transfascial fixation and potentially reduces technical difficulties.